CIEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clearfield has a net margin of 0.8% compared to Ciena's net margin of 2.81%. Ciena's return on equity of 3.7% beat Clearfield's return on equity of -0.68%.

Ciena has a consensus price target of $83.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand Clearfield has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.37%. Given that Clearfield has higher upside potential than Ciena, analysts believe Clearfield is more attractive than Ciena.

Ciena has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.893% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clearfield has a beta of 1.686, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.581%.

Ciena has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clearfield offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ciena pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clearfield pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ciena quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Clearfield quarterly revenues of $47.2M. Ciena's net income of $9M is higher than Clearfield's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Ciena's price-to-earnings ratio is 104.78x while Clearfield's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ciena is 2.58x versus 3.32x for Clearfield. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Wireless has a net margin of 0.8% compared to Ciena's net margin of -8.05%. Ciena's return on equity of 3.7% beat Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -4.45%.

Ciena has a consensus price target of $83.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand Franklin Wireless has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 307.13%. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Ciena, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Ciena.

Ciena has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.893% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.171%.

Ciena has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Wireless offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ciena pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Wireless pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ciena quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues of $8M. Ciena's net income of $9M is higher than Franklin Wireless's net income of -$644.8K. Notably, Ciena's price-to-earnings ratio is 104.78x while Franklin Wireless's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ciena is 2.58x versus 1.02x for Franklin Wireless. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a net margin of 0.8% compared to Ciena's net margin of -13.77%. Ciena's return on equity of 3.7% beat Hewlett Packard Enterprise's return on equity of 6.17%.

Ciena has a consensus price target of $83.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand Hewlett Packard Enterprise has an analysts' consensus of $21.12 which suggests that it could grow by 18.59%. Given that Hewlett Packard Enterprise has higher upside potential than Ciena, analysts believe Hewlett Packard Enterprise is more attractive than Ciena.

Ciena has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.893% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a beta of 1.313, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.299%.

Ciena has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hewlett Packard Enterprise offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Ciena pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hewlett Packard Enterprise pays out 26.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Hewlett Packard Enterprise's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ciena quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Hewlett Packard Enterprise quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Ciena's net income of $9M is higher than Hewlett Packard Enterprise's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Ciena's price-to-earnings ratio is 104.78x while Hewlett Packard Enterprise's PE ratio is 17.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ciena is 2.58x versus 0.76x for Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netgear has a net margin of 0.8% compared to Ciena's net margin of -3.72%. Ciena's return on equity of 3.7% beat Netgear's return on equity of 4.81%.

Ciena has a consensus price target of $83.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand Netgear has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.83%. Given that Ciena has higher upside potential than Netgear, analysts believe Ciena is more attractive than Netgear.

Ciena has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.893% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netgear has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.438%.

Ciena has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netgear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ciena pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netgear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ciena quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Netgear quarterly revenues of $162.1M. Ciena's net income of $9M is higher than Netgear's net income of -$6M. Notably, Ciena's price-to-earnings ratio is 104.78x while Netgear's PE ratio is 34.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ciena is 2.58x versus 1.22x for Netgear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.